There is a parallel fact here that deserves our attention. Most people think that "mental" means "conscious", but we extend the word "mental" to include the non-conscious parts of the mind. The same is true as far as the word "sexual" is concerned; most people think that it has the same meaning as "reproductive" — or, more precisely, "genital" — while we regard everything that is not genital and has nothing to do with reproduction as "sexual". These two things are only similar in form, but they are also of more profound significance. But if the existence of sexual perversion is such a strong reason for this problem, why didn't someone finish the work and solve the problem earlier? I can't say anything about that. In my opinion, the perversion of sex has already become a special forbidden zone, forming a theory vaguely, and even interfering with the scientific judgment of this subject. Everyone seems to remember that perversions are not only disgusting, but absurd and terrible, as if they emit a seductive power, and basically a secret jealousy to hang those who are friendly with perverts, which is the same feeling that the count sitting and judging in the famous satirical poem Tannhauser confesses to himself: On Mount Eros, conscience and obligation are forgotten in this way! Attention,Inflatable bouncer, this kind of thing has nothing to do with me! In fact, the sufferer of perversion is very much like a wretch, who has to pay a painful price in exchange for the satisfaction that is not easy to obtain. Although sexual perversion seems to have unnatural objects and goals, it obviously contains sexual implications, because the action of satisfying perversion desire usually ends up reaching the highest point of pornography and ejaculation. This, of course,inflatable bounce house with slide, is as far as adults are concerned; children have neither the highest point of eroticism nor the possibility of ejaculation; they have a similar action as a substitute, but this substitute cannot be determined to be sexual. I would also like to add a few points so that we have a correct understanding of the perversion of sex. Although these phenomena are despised by ordinary people, they are quite different from normal sexual activities, but from a simple observation, we can see that in the sexual life of normal people, there are inevitably this or that kind of perversion. Kissing, for example, may be called a perversion at first, because it is the contact of the sexual areas of the lips, not the genitals. However, inflatable water slide ,Inflatable dry slide, no one has ever condemned kissing as a perversion; in the theater, it is seen as a glorified sexual act. However, it is not difficult for kissing to become an absolute perverse action-for example, when the intensity of its stimulation is so great that it is accompanied by the peak of pornography and the phenomenon of ejaculation, which is also common. Another example is that a person has to look at and touch his object in order to enjoy sex, while another person has to pinch and bite in the extreme excitement of sex, and the greatest excitement of pornography in some people is not caused by the genitals of the other person, but by other parts of his body, and so on. Of course, we cannot exclude people with this kind of idiosyncrasy from normal people and place them in the ranks of perverters; in fact, the essence of perversion does not lie in the shift of sexual goals, nor in the replacement of genitals, nor even in the change of objects, but only in the complete exclusion of sexual intercourse for the purpose of reproduction for the satisfaction of abnormal phenomena. As for the perverted actions committed in order to promote or prepare for the completion of normal sexual intercourse, these actions are no longer actually perverted. From this fact, the gap between normal and perverted sex is greatly reduced, and it is evident that normal sex has evolved from the sex of infants, by first cutting out certain useless elements, and then assembling others to make them subordinate to a new purpose, that of reproduction. This idea of perversion can now be applied more deeply and definitely to the study or explanation of the sexual life of infants; but before doing so, notice an important difference between the two. Presumably, the perverse sexual life is unusually concentrated, its whole activity tending to one — mostly the only — object; there is a particular component impulse which occupies the most important place; perhaps this impulse alone, perhaps for its own purposes, dominates the others. At this point, perverted sex is consistent with normal sex, except that the dominant part of the impulse and the goal of sex are different from each other. Both form a richly organized system. It's just that the ruling forces are different from each other. As for the baby's sexual life, it generally lacks this kind of concentration and organization, and his various impulses are equally effective, pursuing their own pleasure independently. From this lack of concentration in childhood and its presence in adulthood, it can be seen that both normal and perverted sexual life originate from the sexual life of infants. There are also many perverse phenomena that are more similar to the sexual life of infants, because there are many "partial instincts" in them, compo nent instincts and their goals,Inflatable meltdown, which develop independently of each other and even remain forever. However, as far as these phenomena are concerned, it is more correct to call it the infantilism of sexual life than the perversion of sexual life. joyshineinflatables.com
top of page
bottom of page